Optimizing Your Organization's 'Fingerprint' A Holistic Systems Approach to Value Creation Based on McKinsey Report: "A New Operating Model for a New World"
Optimizing Your Organization's
'Fingerprint'
A Holistic Systems Approach to Value
Creation
Based on McKinsey Report: "A
New Operating Model for a New World"
Executive Summary
In an era where uncertainty has
become the norm, even companies with superior strategies struggle to realize
their full potential. McKinsey's latest research reveals that high-performing
organizations experience a 30% gap between their strategy's potential and
actual outcomes, primarily due to deficiencies in their operating models.
This report represents a significant
evolution of the 7-S Framework(Strategy,
Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, Staff), which has guided organizational
design for half a century. It introduces a new paradigm capable of responding
to rapidly shifting geopolitical, technological, and societal trends: the
"Organize to Value" system—a dynamic operating model design
methodology comprising 12 interconnected elements.
We recommend that global leaders use
this report to intentionally design their organization's unique "Operating
Model Fingerprint" and dramatically enhance strategic execution
capabilities.
1. Why Rethinking the Operating
Model is Critical Now
The Strategy-to-Performance Gap
Many CEOs believe that "the
right strategy is the key to success." Indeed, strategy provides the
foundation for how organizations allocate scarce resources—people, capital, and
materials. However, even the best strategy does not automatically yield strong
performance.
To transform strategic potential
into market-leading results, organizations need an effective operating model
that is intentionally designed to deliver four outcomes that all organizations
covet: Clarity, Speed, Skills, and Commitment.
The Challenge of Frequent
Reorganizations
Leaders understand this importance,
which is why they frequently attempt to adapt their operating models. Research
shows that two-thirds of organizations have redesigned their operating models
in the past two years, and half plan to embark on a redesign in the next two
years.
These numbers highlight the ongoing
challenge of creating high-functioning organizations that consistently generate
value. Many redesigns fail to deliver expected outcomes because leaders focus
primarily on "structure" while lacking a more comprehensive systems
perspective.
2. Beyond the Traditional 7-S(Strategy,
Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, Staff): Organizational Design
as a Holistic System
Structure Alone is Insufficient
When rethinking their operating
models, many leaders begin by focusing on organizational structure. This was a
natural starting point for executives trained in traditional hierarchical
structures and more stable environments. Structure provides visibility into how
strategy is implemented, creates accountability, and establishes the basis for
performance management.
However, structure alone does not
create value. Structure is merely one of 12 interconnected design elements
that together form an integrated system through which organizations truly
generate value.
Responding to Environmental Change
Operating model design has evolved
substantially over the past decade. Organizations have been forced to respond
to fast-moving geopolitical, technological, and societal trends. A tailored
operating model and the degree of transformation required for implementation
depend partly on how organizations experience these trends and the design
choices they imply.
McKinsey's research asked executives
to identify the most significant opportunities and challenges affecting their
business and organizational structure approach. The results revealed:
Greatest Opportunities
(Technology-related):
- Scaling AI and automation
- Accelerating digitalization
- Expanding data value
Greatest Challenges:
- Increasing regulatory complexity
(Geopolitical)
- Declining trust in business
(Geopolitical)
- Shifting workforce demographics,
particularly skills loss from aging in developed economies (Societal)
The Potential of Emerging Structures
Eighty-nine percent of surveyed
organizations still primarily use traditional hierarchical structures (business
unit/holding company, matrix management, or functional organization). The
remaining 11% have adopted one of three emerging structures: product platform
model, enterprise agile model, or decentralized network.
The crucial finding is that no
single structure is universally effective. High-performing organizations
can be found using any of these six structures. However, organizations using
emerging structures tend to prioritize innovation, technology, and data, and
demonstrate higher readiness to handle the impact of AI scaling and digitalization.
This research explains why many
leaders focus on structural redesign while revealing a critical fact: structure
alone does not determine whether an organization is prepared to fulfill its
business strategy in the current volatile context.
3. The 12 Elements of the 'Organize
to Value' System
The 12 Elements as a System
Decades of organizational experience
and new data collected on high-performing operating models have yielded an
updated system of 12 elements that represent the best of modern operating model
design.
In addition to structure, these
elements include: purpose, value agenda, ecosystem, leadership, governance,
processes, technology, behaviors, rewards, footprint, and talent.
Strategic Foundation
1. Purpose
- Definition: How the organization
defines its core reason for being
- Link to Performance: Clear purpose
helps employees and stakeholders navigate uncertainty
2. Value Agenda
- Definition: How the organization
creates value
- Link to Performance: Clarity on the
value agenda enables optimal resource allocation
3. Structure
- Definition: How accountable units
and mission teams are designed
- Link to Performance: Internal
organization in the service of strategy enhances prioritization and
accountability
External Collaboration
4. Ecosystem
- Definition: How the organization
works with partners to create value
- Link to Performance: External
partnerships create and share value beyond organizational boundaries and
capabilities
Operating Mechanisms
5. Leadership
- Definition: How leaders make
decisions and catalyze action
- Link to Performance: Roles and
dominant approach to decision-making are clear and consistently
implemented
6. Governance
- Definition: How to set priorities,
allocate resources, and manage business performance
- Link to Performance: Enterprise
resources are managed in a consistent, integrated way aligned with
strategy
7. Processes
- Definition: How workflows are
designed
- Link to Performance: Approach to
value-creating activities is clear and consistent across the enterprise
8. Technology
- Definition: How digital, data, and
AI enable value creation
- Link to Performance: Data and AI
are deployed to increase productivity and drive new sources of value
creation
Human Elements
9. Behaviors
- Definition: How culture is nurtured
across the organization
- Link to Performance: A unique
"secret sauce" creates value for employees and customers
10. Rewards
- Definition: How people are rewarded
for performance
- Link to Performance: Rewards
support desired behaviors and practices that increase value
11. Footprint
- Definition: How the organization
locates and deploys talent
- Link to Performance: The right
skills are available in the right locations aligned with business needs
and priorities
12. Talent
- Definition: How the organization
attracts and develops talent
- Link to Performance: The right
capabilities are available to meet value creation goals
The Significance of the
'Fingerprint' Concept
These 12 elements function as a
system that enables the organization to deliver on its strategy. By mapping
current organizational choices across all 12 elements, leaders can better
understand their organization's unique Operating Model Fingerprint and
determine whether each choice aligns with strategic goals.
This system offers leaders two
options:
- Move to an adjacent fingerprint
by refining only the elements most critical to strategy execution
- Shift all 12 elements to create an entirely
new fingerprint
Either choice can create a unique
form of competitive advantage.
Case Study: The Airline Example
A top-performing airline illustrates
how an intentionally designed Operating Model Fingerprint can support
performance. The company focused on achieving two business outcomes: delivering
an exceptional passenger experience and driving industry-leading
efficiency and financial resilience.
To reach these goals, the airline
made specific choices across each of the 12 elements:
- To support passenger experience,
it anchors its purpose in organizational reputation and customer benefit
- To ensure the same high standards
for every passenger, it maintains an integrated footprint approach with
globally distributed workforce directly employed
- To spur efficiency and
resilience, it leverages a traditional value chain ecosystem
- To make its matrix structure work,
it emphasizes decisive leadership to ensure clarity and speed of
decision-making
- Given the importance of costs and
safety, it relies on control-oriented processes
These choices collectively formed
the airline's unique Operating Model Fingerprint, helping leaders execute the
strategy on passenger experience, efficiency, and financial resilience.
Results: Through intentional operating model
design, the airline achieved higher performance compared to peers—better
on-time performance, an EBITDA margin several percentage points higher than
peers, and customer satisfaction scores above the sector average.
4. Future-Proofing the Operating
Model: A Four-Step Approach
Why Redesigns Frequently Fail
Leaders frustrated with
organizational performance often turn to redesigns. However, they again focus
primarily on structure rather than the 12 elements and the system they form.
This explains why redesigns happen so frequently—and why they tend to leave
value on the table.
Four actions can help organizations
avoid this constant churn.
Step 1: Document the Current
Fingerprint
As noted earlier, the first step is
understanding the organization's unique Operating Model Fingerprint—the
combination of design choices made across all 12 elements.
By assessing the current
fingerprint, leaders can identify what is working and what is misaligned with
strategic goals.
Step 2: Compare Performance with
Successful Fingerprints
Next, leaders can compare their
fingerprint and outcomes to highly successful Operating Model Fingerprints
across industries.
This comparison enables leaders to
choose whether the best course is to move to an adjacent fingerprint by
refining select elements, or to move to an entirely new fingerprint.
Step 3: Choose Between Refinement
and Radical Redesign
Leadership teams establish and
validate the value and risks of two options:
Option 1: Selective Evolution Make changes to only the most
critical elements, retaining existing strengths while making incremental
improvements. Lower risk but limited value creation potential.
Option 2: Fundamental Transformation Implement transformation across all
12 elements, moving to an entirely new fingerprint. Higher risk but potential
for significantly higher value realization.
The decision should employ both
top-down analysis (comparing outcomes with exemplar companies) and bottom-up
analysis (setting specific targets for key capabilities) to create a robust
business case for each option.
Step 4: Commit to Specific
Performance Outcomes and Delivery Path
Equipped with a complete definition
of the target Operating Model Fingerprint, the leadership team collaborates
with a broader executive group (e.g., 50 executives), providing them the
opportunity to refine implementation approaches and talent decisions.
Implementation encompasses
fundamental changes to not only "hard" operating model elements such
as structure, processes, and technology, but also "soft" elements
including leadership style, culture (new roles, behaviors, and rewards), and
talent development.
Additionally, comparing the
organization's historical performance and future plans against benchmarks for
digitally native companies enables commitment to significantly more ambitious
goals—revenue growth, enhanced customer experience, and accelerated new product
development.
After completing the transition,
leaders continue to evaluate their new Operating Model Fingerprint, refining it
as needed to align with strategic aspirations.
5. Expected Outcomes: Four
Measurable Results
A fit-for-purpose operating model
that maximizes value creation enables CEOs to achieve four measurable outcomes:
1. Clarity
Resources and accountabilities are
aligned to strategy
In volatile times, it is essential
that CEOs can see for themselves how resources and teams deployed throughout
the organization reflect strategic priorities. By clarifying who is accountable
for the value agenda, the entire organization can navigate change and replace
bureaucratic layers with flexible teams that have a clear sense of purpose.
Creating ideal spans of control and
flattening the organization are crucial. The value of clarity also extends
beyond traditional organizational boundaries by enabling ecosystem development.
2. Speed
Workflows are fast, tech-enabled,
and frictionless
Getting resource allocation and
accountability right is important, but it is just the first step in translating
strategy into performance. Executing a great strategy quickly is often
difficult when leaders take too long to make decisions or poor governance
prevents identification of the right decisions.
When work is done in silos with
multiple hand-offs rather than streamlined workflows, it becomes hard to
capture the value of emerging technologies, including generative AI. For
leaders needing to move quickly, codifying decision rights and incrementally
improving processes to automate repetitive work is no longer enough.
Instead, leaders must establish how
to use technology to spur human creativity, including determining how people
and AI work together.
3. Skills
A future-ready workforce is equipped
to deliver the highest value
Geopolitics and new technologies are
challenging long-held assumptions about how to source talent and whether to
develop skills in-house or through partnerships. Leaders can go beyond static
workforce planning by continually upgrading talent and reevaluating location
and outsourcing decisions.
This allows organizations to keep
pace with a dramatically changing labor market. With the wrong Operating Model
Fingerprint, the risk is that the market for skills changes faster than the
organization's ability to source, hire, develop, and deploy talent.
4. Commitment
Creating a performance-oriented
culture
Strategy implementation, especially
in a volatile era, requires a highly committed workforce and motivating
culture. By creating a shared set of behaviors—a cultural "secret
sauce"—organizations can move more quickly and engage colleagues effectively.
Reward systems can be designed to
encourage these behaviors, support how decisions are made, and ensure the right
work gets done. When employees adopt common behaviors, it creates a healthy
organizational culture that acts as a multiplier effect on performance, further
focusing resources and accelerating strategy.
Quantitative Impact
When organizations take this
holistic approach to operating model redesign, what can they expect for their
bottom line? McKinsey's research reveals that a great operating model can go a
long way toward closing the strategy-to-performance gap.
Organizations that shifted from
traditional structures to emerging structures and redesigned the other 11
elements of the system achieved results including:
- 10-30% improvement in
customer satisfaction, operational performance, and efficiency
- 5-10x increase in
speed of driving change and decision-making
- 10-30 percentage point increase in
employee engagement
6. Practical Questions for Global
Leaders: Five Critical Inquiries
Before embarking on an operating
model redesign, CEOs should step back to identify the outcomes and risks of
evolving or more radically redesigning their model.
Many leaders overestimate the
results of changing individual elements, particularly structure, yet
underestimate the degree of difficulty in implementing more holistic change.
Therefore, a practical approach to refining and evolving the model as a system
starts with asking five key questions:
Question 1: What is the gap between
your value agenda and delivered performance?
Assess recent strategic plans,
identify areas where goals were not fully achieved, and identify potential root
causes for these gaps.
Question 2: What are the critical
outcomes your operating model should generate to enable the value agenda?
Define desired future performance
across the four outcomes, creating accountability for your most important
initiatives and the specific performance metrics you must achieve.
Question 3: How does your operating
model work as a system to create value?
Assess the 12 operating model
elements to make design choices that work together and reinforce your ability
to deliver business outcomes and strategy. This includes identifying obvious
inconsistencies across the 12 elements and areas where poor execution has
limited the effectiveness of design choices.
Question 4: What are the trade-offs
between refining your current operating model and moving to a new design?
Evaluate the degree of change
required to capture the value creation potential of a new model and determine
the hard and soft factors that could prevent you from doing so effectively.
Question 5: How will leaders need to
engage differently to enable the operating model at scale?
Take stock of how leaders (including
middle managers) can lead in the ways required in the new operating model and
demonstrate the mindset and behavior shifts necessary for the model to succeed.
Conclusion: Systems Perspective
Creates Competitive Advantage
Organizations looking to make their
operating models more effective can start by identifying the causes of their
strategy-to-performance gap, followed by choosing whether to redesign several
of the 12 elements or all of them.
Whatever choice they make, viewing
the elements as a holistic system can help leaders meet strategic goals and
bolster performance in a complex business environment.
In a world where uncertainty has
become the norm, the ability to intentionally design and continuously evolve
your organization's unique "Operating Model Fingerprint" becomes the
source of sustainable competitive advantage for winning in global competition.
Source: McKinsey & Company, "A new
operating model for a new world"
Target Audience: Global Leaders, Executive Leadership, Organizational
Transformation Officers
Next Steps:
- Map your organization's current
Operating Model Fingerprint across the 12 elements
- Quantify the
strategy-to-performance gap and identify root causes
- Compare your organization with
industry leaders and exemplar companies across sectors
- Work with your leadership team to
decide between refinement and radical redesign
- Commit to specific outcome metrics
and an implementation roadmap
Ready to Optimize Your
Organization's Operating Model Fingerprint?
In an era where uncertainty has
become the norm, closing the strategy-to-performance gap is the most critical
challenge for winning in global competition.
Keisho Global Risk Management offers comprehensive consulting
services based on the 12-element system introduced in this report—from
diagnosing your organization's current Operating Model Fingerprint to designing
and implementing transformative change.
How We Can Support Your Organization
✓ Current State Assessment -
Visualize your organization's fingerprint across all 12 elements
✓ Gap Analysis - Identify root
causes of your strategy-to-performance gap
✓ Optimal Design - Design your
target model based on industry leader benchmarking
✓ Transformation Execution -
Develop and execute implementation roadmaps with your leadership team
✓ Continuous Evolution -
Support ongoing model refinement in response to environmental changes
For CEOs and Leaders Facing These
Challenges
- You have a strong strategy, but
aren't achieving expected results
- You've undergone multiple
reorganizations without fundamental change
- Digital transformation and AI
adoption aren't progressing as planned
- You're experiencing challenges in
global organizational operations
- Your organization struggles to
respond to rapid environmental changes
Let's start by understanding your
unique situation.
We offer a complimentary 30-minute
consultation session for candid dialogue about your challenges and
opportunities.
Contact Us
Email: info@keishogrm.com
Please include "Operating Model
Assessment Inquiry" in your subject line and provide:
- Your name and title
- Company name and industry
- Current organizational challenges
(brief description is fine)
- Preferred consultation format
(online/in-person)
Our consulting team will respond
within 48 hours.
Let's co-create the organizational
"fingerprint" that will help you win in global competition.
Keisho Global Risk Management
Your Partner in Organizational Excellence
#Organizational
Transformation
#Business
Strategy
#Leadership
#Global
Management
#Digital
Transformation
#Operating Model #McKinsey#7-S
Framework #Organizational Design#Strategy Execution #Value Creation #Innovation #Agile Organization #Organizational Culture #Talent Management #AI
Implementation#Digitalization #Global Leadership #Organizational Reform #Performance
Improvement



コメント
コメントを投稿